From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Charles Comiskey" <comiskey(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
Date: | 2006-06-22 17:51:05 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA7A@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?
> > The file dllinit.c, located in the src/utils directory
> documents the
> > author as Mumit Khan. Did Mumit Khan contribute this code
> and did he
> > contribute it for distribution under the PostgreSQL license? If I
> > read correctly, the name stamp in CVS does not indicate that Mumit
> > Khan directly contributed this file. I ask because this
> question has
> > surfaced as a forum item for a different project and Mumit Khan
> > directly answered their forum posting
> (http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-11/0061.html)
>
> Per the comments in that thread, it would be pretty trivial
> to either rewrite or remove this file. I don't think there
> is anything there that amounts to protectable content (and
> Mumit evidently agrees, see link) but let's do something
> about it anyway. Can some of the Windows folk check whether
> we can just remove it?
I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.
The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.
I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2006-06-22 17:56:28 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2006-06-22 17:50:36 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |