Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Charles Comiskey" <comiskey(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date: 2006-06-22 17:51:05
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA7A@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?
> > The file dllinit.c, located in the src/utils directory
> documents the
> > author as Mumit Khan. Did Mumit Khan contribute this code
> and did he
> > contribute it for distribution under the PostgreSQL license? If I
> > read correctly, the name stamp in CVS does not indicate that Mumit
> > Khan directly contributed this file. I ask because this
> question has
> > surfaced as a forum item for a different project and Mumit Khan
> > directly answered their forum posting
> (http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-11/0061.html)
>
> Per the comments in that thread, it would be pretty trivial
> to either rewrite or remove this file. I don't think there
> is anything there that amounts to protectable content (and
> Mumit evidently agrees, see link) but let's do something
> about it anyway. Can some of the Windows folk check whether
> we can just remove it?

I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.

The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.

I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-06-22 17:56:28 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2006-06-22 17:50:36 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC