| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions |
| Date: | 2006-06-22 18:25:17 |
| Message-ID: | 2081.1151000717@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>>> item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?
> I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
> because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.
> The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
> don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.
> I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.
The part of it that seems not to be a no-op is
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
__hDllInstance_base = hInst;
#endif /* __CYGWIN__ */
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
_impure_ptr = __imp_reent_data;
#endif
and the whole thing is wrapped in
#if CYGWIN_VERSION_DLL_MAJOR < 1001
so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions. Can anyone
say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PFC | 2006-06-22 18:28:22 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2006-06-22 18:23:15 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |