| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP |
| Date: | 2005-10-12 14:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7AB8@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > To reiterate the basic point: The broken LSP breaks a fundamental
> > promise in the sockets API that we absolutely require. The bug is
> > completely within the LSP.
>
> ISTM that maybe what we have here is a documentation shortcoming.
> I'm thinking that our Windows FAQ ought to suggest
> troubleshooting socket-related problems by removing LSPs one
> at a time.
We used to have this, but we removed it when we aded the code that fixed
the problem in 95% of the cases. It's probably a good idea to bring it
back :-(
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-12 14:51:52 | Re: slow IN() clause for many cases |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-12 14:34:46 | Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP |