Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
Date: 2005-10-12 14:34:46
Message-ID: 1141.1129127686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> To reiterate the basic point: The broken LSP breaks a fundamental
> promise in the sockets API that we absolutely require. The bug is
> completely within the LSP.

ISTM that maybe what we have here is a documentation shortcoming.
I'm thinking that our Windows FAQ ought to suggest troubleshooting
socket-related problems by removing LSPs one at a time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-10-12 14:35:54 Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-12 14:26:26 Re: database vacuum from cron hanging