Re: Backup taking long time !!!

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dinesh Chandra 12108 <Dinesh(dot)Chandra(at)cyient(dot)com>, Madusudanan(dot)B(dot)N <b(dot)n(dot)madusudanan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Backup taking long time !!!
Date: 2017-01-23 15:16:38
Message-ID: 68f87a97-15c2-5e4e-5730-77f9af2ca165@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 1/20/17 9:06 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> All the pages are the same size, so I'm surprised you didn't consider
> just having a format along the lines of: magic+offset+page,
> magic+offset+page, magic+offset+page, etc...

Keep in mind that if you go that route you need to accommodate BLKSZ <>
8192.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-23 15:27:22 Re: Backup taking long time !!!
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-23 15:10:00 Re: optimizing immutable vs. stable function calls?