From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Adrian Ho <ml+postgresql(at)03s(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x |
Date: | 2021-07-08 07:53:11 |
Message-ID: | 68D22062-EC78-47C5-BC46-EF2F77193E19@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> On 7 Jul 2021, at 18:57, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Adrian Ho <ml+postgresql(at)03s(dot)net> writes:
>> Thanks, Tom, that turned out to only require one additional line, since
>> $LIBS is already being saved and restored around that block:
>
> I poked at this a bit further and realized that it's got a showstopper
> problem: in OpenLDAP 2.4, ldap_simple_bind() exists in both libldap.so
> and libldap_r.so. Thus, if we were dealing with an installation that
> does not have a thread-safe libldap, the patched configure would
> incorrectly seize on libldap.so as being an acceptable substitute,
> allowing weird hard-to-diagnose failures at runtime.
>
> IOW, while it might look from our existing coding like there's something
> about ldap_simple_bind() that is tied to reentrancy, there isn't. How
> else can we determine whether an OpenLDAP library is reentrant, if we
> can no longer depend on the _r suffix?
Couldn't we add a version check to find if we have < 2.5 or >= 2.5, and adjust
libs accordingly? Alternatively we could perhaps check for
LDAP_API_FEATURE_X_OPENLDAP_REENTRANT which IIUC when set defines -lldap to be
reentrant.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-08 08:04:54 | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2021-07-08 07:49:39 | Re: The case when AsyncAppend exists also in the qual of Async ForeignScan |