Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases

From: "Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases
Date: 2006-03-17 17:48:47
Message-ID: 684362e10603170948v4c2dc159m@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2006/3/17, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The psql manual pages for 8.1 now has:
> >
> > > \set HISTFILE ~/.psql_history- :DBNAME

Any reason psql doesn't do this by default? It is clear that the
database name does not unambiguously identify a database, but having a
history for each database name is already an improvement over the
current situation.

Markus Bertheau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-17 18:51:01 Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-17 17:04:04 Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases