Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit
Date: 2007-01-10 14:29:47
Message-ID: 6819.1168439387@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> What? I'm completely lost here. What does log_temp_files have to do with
> the bits on the tuple header?

Nothing, it looks like Bruce replied to the wrong message at one point
while these two threads were active ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-01-10 14:30:18 Re: Operator family docs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-10 14:28:34 Re: Operator family docs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-01-10 14:42:50 Re: [PATCHES] fix build on Solaris 10/x86_64 in 64bit mode with Sun
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-01-10 10:47:22 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Bundle of patches