| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit |
| Date: | 2007-01-10 09:28:15 |
| Message-ID: | 45A4B1AF.1030704@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Patch applied. Thanks.
>>> I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.
>> Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
>> fetch or store the natts value? This is not a zero-cost improvement.
>
> SHOW ALL has:
>
> log_temp_files | -1 | Log the use of temporary files larger than th
>
> and pg_settings has:
>
> log_temp_files | -1 | kB | Reporting and Logging / What to Log
>
> Looks OK to me.
What? I'm completely lost here. What does log_temp_files have to do with
the bits on the tuple header?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-01-10 09:31:49 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit |
| Previous Message | Benny Amorsen | 2007-01-10 09:26:06 | Re: Patch to log usage of temporary files |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-01-10 09:31:49 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit |
| Previous Message | Benny Amorsen | 2007-01-10 09:26:06 | Re: Patch to log usage of temporary files |