| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: policies and extensions |
| Date: | 2020-02-18 03:48:27 |
| Message-ID: | 679.1581997707@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> writes:
> I tried to define a policy within an extension but the policy does not
> seem to belong to the extension. Is this the way it is supposed to be?
Yeah, I would expect that.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/extend-extensions.html
says:
The kinds of SQL objects that can be members of an extension are shown
in the description of ALTER EXTENSION. ...
Also notice that while a table can be a member of
an extension, its subsidiary objects such as indexes are not directly
considered members of the extension. ...
An RLS policy is a table "subsidiary object" so it only depends indirectly
on the extension that owns the table.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranjan Gajare | 2020-02-18 09:46:02 | Logical Replication ERROR reporting issue |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-02-18 03:28:25 | Re: policies and extensions |