| From: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc Cousin" <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Craig Ringer" <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
| Date: | 2011-12-08 17:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | 67818414fd9048cde82084476cef3837.squirrel@sq.gransy.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8 Prosinec 2011, 18:14, Marc Cousin wrote:
>> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements,
>> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while
>> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from
>> > pgbouncer.
>>
>> Yes. But if you expect that PostgreSQL will mimic Oracle architecture,
>> then you're mistaken. It's simply a different solution with different
>> architecture, and that means you may need to use different application
>> design sometimes.
>
> I just don't understand what you're getting all heated up for. I don't
> want PostgreSQL to mimic Oracle, and I'm only answering to Simon's
> question at the begining.
Sorry, I was not arguing with you nor heated up. It's rather a translation
mistake - in my native language we often use 'you' when we actually mean
'someone.' So it should be something like "If someone expects ... he's
mistaken," etc.
Tomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Cousin | 2011-12-08 17:45:56 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-08 17:23:25 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |