From: | Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Date: | 2011-12-08 17:45:56 |
Message-ID: | 2404719.o0AM9joDfP@marco |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 08 December 2011 18:34:35 Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 8 Prosinec 2011, 18:14, Marc Cousin wrote:
> >> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared
> >> > statements,
> >> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while
> >> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from
> >> > pgbouncer.
> >>
> >> Yes. But if you expect that PostgreSQL will mimic Oracle architecture,
> >> then you're mistaken. It's simply a different solution with different
> >> architecture, and that means you may need to use different application
> >> design sometimes.
> >
> > I just don't understand what you're getting all heated up for. I don't
> > want PostgreSQL to mimic Oracle, and I'm only answering to Simon's
> > question at the begining.
>
> Sorry, I was not arguing with you nor heated up. It's rather a translation
> mistake - in my native language we often use 'you' when we actually mean
> 'someone.' So it should be something like "If someone expects ... he's
> mistaken," etc.
Ok, no problem, that just felt weird :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-08 17:48:13 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-08 17:34:35 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |