Re: How to diagnose max_locks_per_transaction is about to be exhausted?

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to diagnose max_locks_per_transaction is about to be exhausted?
Date: 2015-04-01 14:09:57
Message-ID: 676112386.2865681.1427897397362.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc> wrote:

> max_locks_per_transaction enforces some restriction:
> the_locks_count <= the_threshold
>
> the_threshold is max_locks_per_transaction * (max_connections +
> max_prepared_transactions), the documentation is quite clear.
>
> What is the_locks_count?
> In docs we see "no more than this many distinct objects can be
> locked at any one time".
> What kinds of locks should we include? does the limit really
> restricts *distinct* objects count and what is the distinction
> key for every lock kind?
>
> What should one change in the following query to make it show the
> value limited by the_threshold?
>
> select
> count(distinct relation) + count(distinct (classid, objid))
> from pg_locks

I think the "distinct" reference is because if one connection takes
out the same lock on the same object (e.g., a table) you don't need
to count it more than once. The pg_locks view only shows it once
anyway. The view does contain both locks limited by
max_locks_per_transaction and those limited by
max_pred_locks_per_transaction. I think you will get the number
you are looking for simply by excluding the latter from a count of
all rows in the view:

select count(*) from pg_locks where mode <> 'SIReadLock';

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Bashtanov 2015-04-01 14:17:04 Re: How to diagnose max_locks_per_transaction is about to be exhausted?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-04-01 13:47:16 Re: Creating a non-strict custom aggregate that initializes to the first value