Re: Named transaction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" (Command Prompt, Inc(dot)) <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Named transaction
Date: 2009-06-18 13:53:24
Message-ID: 6708.1245333204@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> writes:
> [ proposal involving ]
> SWITCH TRANSACTION first; -- switch context

> So, what do you think guys?

No chance :-(. The amount of work that would be required is *vastly*
out of proportion to any possible benefit. Use multiple connections.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-06-18 13:55:30 Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-06-18 13:21:39 Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen