Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Date: 2009-06-18 13:55:30
Message-ID: 200906181655.31066.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 06 June 2009 16:21:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Now that pg_migrator is in beta
> > (http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=1000235) I was wondering if we want
> > to mention pg_migrator anywhere in our docs or release notes? Josh
> > Berkus is already mentioning it in the draft press release.
>
> Having gotten no replies I assume we don't want to mention pg_migrator
> in the release notes or documentation, which is fine. It is mentioned
> in the press release.

Will you eventually want to ship pg_migrator in contrib? If so, then
documentation will be added when that happens.

If not, we should add a link somewhere where the upgrade process is described
(installation instructions, I think).

The makefile for pg_migrator currently assumes by default that it is located
under contrib/. Which confuses me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2009-06-18 13:58:09 Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-18 13:53:24 Re: Named transaction