| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
| Date: | 2019-11-04 15:05:09 |
| Message-ID: | 6692.1572879909@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>>> Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean
>>> 'goes to stdout' in all branches?
>> Yes.
> +1 for this, FWIW. Let's get it done before next week minors. Is
> anybody writing a patch? If not, I can do it.
Please do.
>> No, I'm not proposing a full revert. But there's certainly room to
>> consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get
>> output to stdout.
> I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated
> promptly.
I'm okay with that approach.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-11-04 15:14:09 | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
| Previous Message | Ravi Krishna | 2019-11-04 15:00:27 | Re: explain plan difference |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-11-04 15:07:23 | Re: 64 bit transaction id |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-04 15:01:25 | Re: alternative to PG_CATCH |