From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- |
Date: | 2019-11-04 14:53:36 |
Message-ID: | 20191104145336.GA23924@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > First, I'd like to clarify what I believe Tom's suggestion is, and then
> > talk through that, as his vote sways this topic pretty heavily.
>
> > Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean
> > 'goes to stdout' in all branches?
>
> Yes.
+1 for this, FWIW. Let's get it done before next week minors. Is
anybody writing a patch? If not, I can do it.
> > If you meant for all branches to accept '-f -' and have it go to a './-'
> > file then that's just a revert of this entire change, which I can't
> > agree with either
>
> No, I'm not proposing a full revert. But there's certainly room to
> consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get
> output to stdout.
I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated
promptly.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ravi Krishna | 2019-11-04 15:00:27 | Re: explain plan difference |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-04 14:45:26 | Re: explain plan difference |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-11-04 14:56:53 | Re: cost based vacuum (parallel) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-11-04 14:28:30 | Re: auxiliary processes in pg_stat_ssl |