"John D. Burger" <john(at)mitre(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah so, that explains how come it noticed. BTW, I see that somebody
>> already changed the array size to 16 bytes in HEAD --- so it's just
>> the back branches that need fixing.
> Um, is that really considered a fix??? We all know that there's no
> guarantee at all, even in ANSI C, that unsigned int isn't bigger than
> 32 bits, right?
OID is 32 bits. Full stop.
regards, tom lane