Re: Rendering pi more nicely in PDF

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rendering pi more nicely in PDF
Date: 2020-04-27 05:00:01
Message-ID: 664f9462-54b1-256c-69f1-9795c5055a40@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

From the symbolic unit of the department...

Hello Tom,
26.04.2020 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the department of nitpickery ...
>
> "&pi;" renders poorly in our PDF docs: as shown in the attached
> screenshot, it doesn't line up on the baseline. I realized that
> this is the same problem I'd run into recently with right-arrow,
> and it can be solved in the same way, namely we have to specify
> use of the symbol font explicitly. So attached is a proposed
> patch to fix it.
>
> Use of a new processing-instruction might not be the most elegant
> way to do this ... anyone have a better suggestion?
I would use the phrase tag, which is intended for such uses: [1] [2].
The "phrase" sounds too generic, but it doesn't require yet another
processing instruction e.g. for &sum; or a similar entity.

[1] http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/CustomInlines.html
[2] https://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/4.5/phrase.html

Best regards,
Alexander

Attachment Content-Type Size
pi.patch text/x-patch 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-04-27 10:16:41 Roles for pg_basebackup
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-04-27 04:02:41 Re: explanation for random_page_cost is outdated