| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rendering pi more nicely in PDF |
| Date: | 2020-04-27 15:04:14 |
| Message-ID: | 25094.1587999854@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 26.04.2020 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Use of a new processing-instruction might not be the most elegant
>> way to do this ... anyone have a better suggestion?
> I would use the phrase tag, which is intended for such uses: [1] [2].
Good idea, done that way.
> The "phrase" sounds too generic, but it doesn't require yet another
> processing instruction e.g. for ∑ or a similar entity.
Yeah, lack of easy applicability to other cases was the main thing
bothering me about the processing-instruction fix.
BTW, I tried to also use this <phrase> markup inside the template for
<returnvalue>, so we'd only need one font-switching special case not two.
Didn't work though --- apparently templates don't get applied recursively?
Oh well.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2020-04-27 16:00:01 | Re: Rendering pi more nicely in PDF |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2020-04-27 10:16:41 | Roles for pg_basebackup |