| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, "Charles Wegrzyn" <lists(at)garbagedump(dot)com>, "Michael Meskes" <Michael(dot)Meskes(at)credativ(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| Date: | 2005-10-14 06:03:01 |
| Message-ID: | 6609.1129269781@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> Can you remember regressions in stable branches in the past?
Yes. Relax. If this were a data-corruption-in-the-backend issue,
I might feel that it mandates an immediate re-release. But it isn't
and it doesn't. You'll note that Michael M. himself didn't bother to
backpatch the fix on first discovery ... so why should anyone else
take it more seriously?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 06:25:12 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 05:52:07 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 06:25:12 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 05:52:07 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 06:25:12 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2005-10-14 05:52:07 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |