| From: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, "Charles Wegrzyn" <lists(at)garbagedump(dot)com>, "Michael Meskes" <Michael(dot)Meskes(at)credativ(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| Date: | 2005-10-14 06:25:12 |
| Message-ID: | 012301c5d088$0940ab90$0f01a8c0@zaphod |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
>> Can you remember regressions in stable branches in the past?
>
> Yes. Relax. If this were a data-corruption-in-the-backend issue,
> I might feel that it mandates an immediate re-release. But it isn't
> and it doesn't. You'll note that Michael M. himself didn't bother to
> backpatch the fix on first discovery ... so why should anyone else
> take it more seriously?
OK. :-)
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Vshivkov | 2005-10-14 06:29:11 | Bug#333854: pg_group file update problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-14 06:03:01 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-10-14 07:19:12 | Re: pg_config --pgxs on Win32 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-14 06:03:01 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Vshivkov | 2005-10-14 06:29:11 | Bug#333854: pg_group file update problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-14 06:03:01 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR |