From: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Confusing message in log file |
Date: | 2008-07-01 14:07:03 |
Message-ID: | 65937bea0807010707ycc1bdeckbdbf459362c066c0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > In any case, this seems a case of stuffing too much in the primary
> > message.
>
> Yeah, good point.
>
> > I think it should be something like
> > errmsg("parameter \"shared_buffer\" change in configuration file
> ignored"),
> > errdetail("This parameter cannot be changed after server start.")
>
> Seems a bit awkwardly phrased. I propose
>
> errmsg("attempted change to parameter \"shared_buffer\" ignored"),
> errdetail("This parameter cannot be changed after server start.")
>
> (or possibly "of" would read better than "to")
>
>
'of' sounds better than 'to'.
Best regards,
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-07-01 14:26:41 | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-01 14:00:16 | Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes |