Re: WIP: CoC V5

From: Elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: CoC V5
Date: 2016-01-13 02:41:08
Message-ID: 65571981-D27C-4C26-81DB-EC62ED1AEBD3@varlena.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The small problem with your version, Joshua, is that the appropriate action is not specified.

Sorry to jump in in the middle. I have not read the comments fully.

Elein Mustain
elein(at)varlena(dot)com

> On Jan 12, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/2016 02:43 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> I think that this is fairly close to something that would make
>> sense, but there is sort of a weirdness in the CoC referring to
>> itself in the 3rd person. It sound more like an argument for
>> *having* a CoC than the document itself.
>>
>> I'm not the greatest word-smith, but I'll attempt to rework Josh's
>> draft to something that seems more "natural" to me. At the same
>> time, I'll try to incorporate other comments, like Tom's comment
>> about enforcement mechanisms and the gray areas in members of the
>> community communicating in public forums.
>
> On Tom's comment, I was waiting until we have a firmed up version. On the communicating in public forums, I must have missed that, do you have a reference?
>
> What isn't shown here, is that I was writing in a similar fashion that you would write a resolution for a NP. Consider (very rough):
>
> WHEREAS
>
> The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) would like to insure a safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment for all.
>
> PGDG Resolves that
>
> 1. There shall be a Code of Conduct governing behaviour for the PGDG community.
>
> 2. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing to contribute in a safe, respectful, productive and collaborative way.
>
> 3. The CoC is not about being offended. As with any diverse community, anyone can get offended at anything.
>
> 4. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of personal attacks and disparaging remarks of any kind.
>
> 5. Any sustained disruption of the collaborative space (mailing lists, IRC etc..) or other PostgreSQL events shall be construed as a violation of the CoC and appropriate action will be taken by the CoC committee.
>
> 6. The CoC is only about interaction with the PostgreSQL community. Your private and public lives outside of the PostgreSQL community are your own.
>
>
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-01-13 02:55:14 Re: WIP: CoC V5
Previous Message Saulo Merlo 2016-01-13 02:29:37 Query Questions - PostgreSQL