Re: WIP: CoC V5

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: CoC V5
Date: 2016-01-13 04:01:35
Message-ID: 5695CC1F.6050208@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/12/2016 06:41 PM, Elein wrote:
> The small problem with your version, Joshua, is that the appropriate action is not specified.
>
> Sorry to jump in in the middle. I have not read the comments fully.
>

It is all good Elein. The lack of appropriate action is purposeful. The
idea is that we decide on a CoC. Then we decide on the next step. Under
current structure that would fall to core. I am of the opinion that the
"action" that the committee decides would be with exception to -core,
with -core being the final (board of directors vote). However, I think
that can all be solved after wording is decided.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-13 04:02:00 Re: WIP: CoC V5
Previous Message oleg yusim 2016-01-13 04:00:27 Data Packaging/Data Unpacking