| From: | Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)comcast(dot)net>, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
| Date: | 2020-06-02 21:19:07 |
| Message-ID: | 652E9B16-5014-40E1-AC77-81CDDAC72D26@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jun 2, 2020, at 14:16 , Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> I'm sure there's things we can do to improve the performance of the FDW.
> Not sure we'll get to a point where we are actually cacheing information
> from the far side... but who knows, maybe if we arrange to have a
> notification sent whenever certain objects are updated...
>
> These things could be worked on independnetly, of course, no need to
> have one done before the other.
By all means, let’s improve the FDW. But is it practical to make it possible to query across databases on the same server, in a similar manner to SQL Server, without needing FDW at all?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-06-02 21:21:05 | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
| Previous Message | Adam Brusselback | 2020-06-02 21:19:06 | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |