Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)comcast(dot)net>, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-02 21:21:05
Message-ID: 20200602212105.GC6680@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greetings,

* Guyren Howe (guyren(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2020, at 14:16 , Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I'm sure there's things we can do to improve the performance of the FDW.
> > Not sure we'll get to a point where we are actually cacheing information
> > from the far side... but who knows, maybe if we arrange to have a
> > notification sent whenever certain objects are updated...
> >
> > These things could be worked on independnetly, of course, no need to
> > have one done before the other.
>
> By all means, let’s improve the FDW. But is it practical to make it possible to query across databases on the same server, in a similar manner to SQL Server, without needing FDW at all?

If you'd like to try and figure out how to make that work, it could be
theoretically possible, but I seriously doubt it'd be at all straight
forward to do, or that it'd ultimately end up being worth it.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-06-02 21:22:49 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Guyren Howe 2020-06-02 21:19:07 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment