Re: PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts
Date: 2018-11-18 11:14:03
Message-ID: 649d9007-9e7a-205d-82a3-cd2d1e4e1488@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

El 18/11/18 a las 04:49, Gerhard Wiesinger escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is not
> a good idea.

I think you got it the other way around. Postgres implementes REDO, that
is, move forward by REDOing the changes which are stored in WAL files

BTW, could you point us to the blog you read this?

Maybe you got REDO and UNDO mixed up.

Saludos,

--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2018-11-18 11:22:55 pgconf eu 2018 slides entry missing from https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Related_Slides_and_Presentations
Previous Message Gerhard Wiesinger 2018-11-18 07:49:06 PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts