Re: PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts

From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>
To: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts
Date: 2018-11-18 12:04:37
Message-ID: 1c664d56-5887-0635-0d04-f836104a8ba6@wiesinger.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 18.11.2018 12:14, Martín Marqués wrote:
> El 18/11/18 a las 04:49, Gerhard Wiesinger escribió:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is not
>> a good idea.
> I think you got it the other way around. Postgres implementes REDO, that
> is, move forward by REDOing the changes which are stored in WAL files
>
> BTW, could you point us to the blog you read this?
>
> Maybe you got REDO and UNDO mixed up.

Yes, I ment UNDO ...

Link is here:

https://severalnines.com/blog/five-cool-things-i-learned-postgresql-conference-europe-2018

sunday morning, too early :-)

Ciao,

Gerhard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2018-11-18 13:20:04 Re: PostgreSQL MVCC and alternative REDO implementation - my thoughts
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2018-11-18 11:22:55 pgconf eu 2018 slides entry missing from https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Related_Slides_and_Presentations