Re: pg_autovacuum -> pg_class.reloptions?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum -> pg_class.reloptions?
Date: 2007-07-06 17:05:28
Message-ID: 6462.1183741528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> A long time ago, Tom proposed moving the pg_autovacuum settings into
> reloptions. I know it's really late in the devel cycle but I wonder if
> such a move would be acceptable at this time?

I think it's too late to be considering essentially-cosmetic changes
for 8.3, especially when you've not even started on a patch.

<rant>
If we don't start saying "no" on a regular basis, we'll never get this
thing out the door. We are already more than two months behind the
intended schedule, and I see absolutely nothing getting done on several
of the major patches.
</rant>

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2007-07-06 17:24:19 Re: usleep feature for pgbench
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-07-06 16:30:06 Re: script binaries renaming