From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: usleep feature for pgbench |
Date: | 2007-07-06 17:24:19 |
Message-ID: | 468E7AC3.3040501@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/6/2007 10:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 21:12 schrieb Jan Wieck:
>> To test some changes in Slony I needed a
>>
>> \usleep [microseconds|:variable]
>>
>> in pgbench's scripting language to be able to have hundreds of
>> concurrent running transactions without totally swamping the system. I
>> was wondering if anyone would object to permanently adding this to the
>> pgbench code?
>
> Or maybe a \sleep command that takes units, if it's not too much work.
>
You mean as a second, optional argument? Good idea.
us = microseconds
ms = milliseconds
s = seconds (default)
\sleep {value|:variable} [us|ms|s]
Is that okay with everyone?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-07-06 17:24:58 | Re: script binaries renaming |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-06 17:05:28 | Re: pg_autovacuum -> pg_class.reloptions? |