Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands
Date: 2025-02-04 16:13:23
Message-ID: 644306.1738685603@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> At this point I would just add a "translator:" comment that explains
> that the ??? bit is for unexpected cases and can be translated in the
> same way.

Hmm, do we have a standard policy or comment wording about that?
I looked for "translator: ... unexpected" and didn't find any
existing comments of that sort.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-02-04 16:27:18 Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-02-04 15:51:19 Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition