Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands
Date: 2025-02-04 19:03:21
Message-ID: 202502041903.tbp7krui4kq6@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Feb-04, Tom Lane wrote:

> =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > At this point I would just add a "translator:" comment that explains
> > that the ??? bit is for unexpected cases and can be translated in the
> > same way.
>
> Hmm, do we have a standard policy or comment wording about that?
> I looked for "translator: ... unexpected" and didn't find any
> existing comments of that sort.

I don't remember cases of messages of that kind marked for translation,
so I'm not surprised that we don't have any such comments. Those would
typically be elog() or the errfoo_internal() cases, I think.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El sudor es la mejor cura para un pensamiento enfermo" (Bardia)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-04 19:23:28 Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-02-04 19:03:10 Re: hash_search_with_hash_value is high in "perf top" on a replica