Re: Status of Opteron vs Xeon

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of Opteron vs Xeon
Date: 2005-10-07 18:44:37
Message-ID: 6429.1128710677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com (Jeff Frost) writes:
>> What's the current status of how much faster the Opteron is compared
>> to the Xeons? I know the Opterons used to be close to 2x faster,
>> but is that still the case? I understand much work has been done to
>> reduce the contect switching storms on the Xeon architecture, is
>> this correct?

> Work has gone into 8.1 to try to help with the context switch storms;
> that doesn't affect previous versions.

Also note that we've found that the current coding of the TAS macro
seems to be very bad for at least some Opterons --- they do much better
if the "pre-test" cmpb is removed. But this is not true for all x86_64
chips. We still have an open issue about what to do about this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-10-07 18:51:36 Re: wal_buffers
Previous Message Chris Browne 2005-10-07 17:33:28 Re: Status of Opteron vs Xeon