Re: wal_buffers

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Ian Westmacott <ianw(at)intellivid(dot)com>, "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wal_buffers
Date: 2005-10-07 18:51:36
Message-ID: 200510071151.36959.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ian, Thomas,

> Thanks; I'd seen the documentation, but not Josh Berkus'
> testing.

BTW, that's still an open question for me. I'm now theorizing that it's
best to set wal_buffers to the expected maximum number of concurrent write
connections. However, I don't have enough test systems to test that
meaningfully.

Your test results will help.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emil Briggs 2005-10-07 19:03:47 Re: Status of Opteron vs Xeon
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-07 18:44:37 Re: Status of Opteron vs Xeon