Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2024-09-04 15:31:36
Message-ID: 63617a30-6078-4e86-b44b-6364e04e210d@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On 03.09.2024 12:52, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> If OR constants have different types, then they belong to different
>> groups, and I think that's unfair. I think that conversion to a
>> single type should be used here - while I’m working on this, I’ll
>> send the code in the next letter.
> IMO, that means additional overhead, isn't it? It is an improvement
> and I suggest to discuss it in a separate thread if current feature
> will be applied.
I think we will have a slight overhead, so in essence it will go
additionally through the transformed groups, and not through the entire
list of Or expressions. I agree with your suggestion to discuss it in
separate thread.
>>
>> And I noticed that there were some tests missing on this, so I added
>> this.
>>
>> I've updated the patch file to include my and Jian's suggestions, as
>> well as the diff file if there's no objection.
> I doubt if you really need additional index on the tenk1 table. What
> is the case you can't reproduce with current indexes, playing, let's
> say, with casting to numeric and integer data types?
> See in attachment minor fixes to the v38 version of the patch set.
>
I rewrote the tests with integer types. Thanks for your suggestion. If
you don't mind, I've updated the diff file you attached earlier to
include the tests.

Attachment Content-Type Size
minor-fix.no-cbot text/plain 6.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-09-04 15:32:55 Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Previous Message Benoit Lobréau 2024-09-04 15:31:25 Re: Logging parallel worker draught