| From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL List Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers |
| Date: | 2007-07-20 18:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | 624757D4-970F-4898-AD63-A7BD450B73C3@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
On Jul 20, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
>> Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to
>> use in my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without
>> HOT would be even better (I know we've got HOT-specific
>> benchmarks, but I want complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
>
> We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL.
> On that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT. I think SpecJ
> would show a greater difference, but we're still focussed on
> benchmarks we can publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.
Bleh, that's not a very impressive number.
Anyone else have something better?
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-07-20 18:35:28 | Re: Feature Matrix |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-07-20 18:30:58 | Re: What's new in 8.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jignesh K. Shah | 2007-07-20 18:56:31 | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-20 18:23:51 | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |