| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL List Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers |
| Date: | 2007-07-20 17:03:31 |
| Message-ID: | 46A0EAE3.7030305@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
Jim,
> Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL. On
that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT. I think SpecJ would show a
greater difference, but we're still focussed on benchmarks we can
publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-07-20 17:10:14 | Re: What's new in 8.3 |
| Previous Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2007-07-20 16:02:33 | Re: Feature Matrix |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-07-20 17:05:54 | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |
| Previous Message | PFC | 2007-07-20 16:55:02 | Re: Simple query showing 270 hours of CPU time |