| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Date: | 2008-05-07 14:17:53 |
| Message-ID: | 6229.1210169873@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I think it would be helpful for us to provide an infrastructure where
> people who don't run their own servers to store their patches at a
> stable URL where they can keep updating the content. I did that with
> the psql wrap patch and it helped me.
Actually, I find that that is a truly awful habit and I wish that people
would *not* do it that way. There are two reasons why not:
* no permanent archive of the submitted patch
* reviewer won't know if the submitter changes the patch after he
downloads a copy, and in fact nobody will ever know unless the submitter
takes the time to compare the eventual commit to what he thinks the
patch is
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:18:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:08:26 | Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:18:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:08:26 | Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:21:48 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-07 14:17:03 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance |