| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Date: | 2008-05-07 14:08:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200805071408.m47E8Qt22784@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Folks, can we avoid posting an email to both hackers and patches lists?
I understand why people do it, but it is best avoided, I think. If you
feel the need to keep patch discussion on hackers, please post just the
patch to patches and a summary to hackers.
Or better yet, have a URL to the patch in an email to hackers.
I think it would be helpful for us to provide an infrastructure where
people who don't run their own servers to store their patches at a
stable URL where they can keep updating the content. I did that with
the psql wrap patch and it helped me.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 14:17:53 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 14:06:17 | Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 14:17:53 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 14:06:17 | Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-07 14:10:47 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-07 13:57:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org? |