Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?
Date: 2008-05-17 20:05:34
Message-ID: 6214.1211054734@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> We could possibly extend the syntax of regression schedule files to have
> a way to say what's the expected exit status, but that seems like more
> work than it's worth. Would it be all right to just remove the test of
> "on error stop" mode?

What I did for the moment is just make it annotate the report, rather
than treating nonzero status as a failure in itself. That will at
least help with diagnosing problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-05-17 20:18:06 Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-05-17 20:02:29 Re: WIP: Pg_upgrade - page layout converter (PLC) hook