Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?
Date: 2008-05-17 20:18:06
Message-ID: 200805172218.06854.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> We could possibly extend the syntax of regression schedule files to have
> a way to say what's the expected exit status, but that seems like more
> work than it's worth.  Would it be all right to just remove the test of
> "on error stop" mode?

Woulnd't it be enough to report the exist status if a test fails, instead of
requiring a certain exit status for success?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2008-05-17 20:23:20 Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-17 20:05:34 Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?