From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Width of SubTransactionId (hello Postgres PRO) |
Date: | 2021-10-28 16:02:30 |
Message-ID: | 617AC996.3020204@anastigmatix.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/28/21 10:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I know of no plans to implement 64-bit transaction ids in community
> Postgres because of the longer tuple header and file format changes.
> It is discussed occasionally though.
Is there anything you can use a SubTransactionId for outside of C code?
PL/Java interacts with these things through BeginInternalSubTransaction(),
ReleaseCurrentSubTransaction(), or RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction()
in C.
It also has been obeying the letter of the JDBC spec by implementing
a method that can return it to the caller (as a Java 32-bit int, oops,
so decreed by the spec). [0]
But as I think about it, I am not sure there is anything interesting or
useful a Java caller could do with a SubTransactionId anyway. I mean, does
it even appear in a statistics view or SQL-exposed function anywhere? I see
there is a top-level backend_xid in pg_stat_activity, but is there any
exposure of SubTransactionIds anywhere?
Everything you can do with a Savepoint in JDBC (release it or roll it back,
what else is there?) is just a method on the Java object and you don't need
to know its underlying id.
Regards,
-Chap
[0]
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/docs/api/java.sql/java/sql/Savepoint.html#method.detail
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-28 16:14:06 | Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies |
Previous Message | Gilles Darold | 2021-10-28 15:55:24 | Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column |