Re: possible bug with compound index.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Dugan <postgres(at)butterflystitches(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible bug with compound index.
Date: 2005-02-14 19:48:37
Message-ID: 616.1108410517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What this brings up is that we have no way to create indexes that have
> mixed ascending/descending column specifications.

> Should this be a TODO? I am unsure.

I thought we already had a TODO to provide reverse-sort operator classes
in the standard distribution. (In the meantime those that need this can
make up their own; see past discussions in the archives.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-14 19:51:34 Re: possible bug with compound index.
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-02-14 19:40:28 Re: possible bug with compound index.