| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Dugan <postgres(at)butterflystitches(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: possible bug with compound index. |
| Date: | 2005-02-14 19:51:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200502141951.j1EJpZd02916@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > What this brings up is that we have no way to create indexes that have
> > mixed ascending/descending column specifications.
>
> > Should this be a TODO? I am unsure.
>
> I thought we already had a TODO to provide reverse-sort operator classes
> in the standard distribution. (In the meantime those that need this can
> make up their own; see past discussions in the archives.)
It wasn't there. Added to TODO:
* Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
specifiers
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ragnar Hafstað | 2005-02-14 19:58:15 | Re: DBI and placeholders question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-14 19:48:37 | Re: possible bug with compound index. |