Re: WIP: CoC

Why must it be free of personal comments?

"Tom, I like the way you handed this issue. Good work!" Is a personal comment.

Why do we need lists? What specifically is wrong with "that focuses on the tech and not the person" version?

Jim

On January 11, 2016 6:04:03 PM EST, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>On 01/11/2016 02:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> How about we meet in the middle:
>>
>>> A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free
>>> of non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual
>>> orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or
>>> personal attacks.
>>
>> That's not really meeting in the middle: it still specifies exactly
>> one set of disapproved topics. Might be OK if it read like
>> "... personal comments, for example ones related to gender, ..."
>
>Tom,
>
>Oh good point. I like that. So:
>
>A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free
>of non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to
>gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size,
>
>race or personal attacks.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>JD
>
>
>--
>Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
>PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
>Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
>control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.