Re: More activity in pg_stat_activity

From: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com>
To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More activity in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2007-01-08 16:54:24
Message-ID: 615004BD-E169-4F41-A0D0-874797D533D1@o.ptimized.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:32 AM, Erik Jones wrote:

>> Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> writes:
>>
> One question regarding my previous thread about the 8.2 client
> tools. We have yet to have time (personal as well as usage pattern
> constraints) to dump our schema to analyze it for any possible
> discrepencies and clock schema queries. Is there any reason we
> couldn't use the 8.1 pg_dump facility until such a time as we can
> figure out our issues with the 8.2 pg_dump client (and psql, etc...)?

If I recall correctly, older pg_dump clients won't work at all with
newer postmasters. In fact, I think it will error out.

--
Thomas F. O'Connell

optimizing modern web applications
: for search engines, for usability, and for performance :

http://o.ptimized.com/
615-260-0005

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Nolan 2007-01-08 16:54:48 Re: Discovering time of last database write
Previous Message Andy Dale 2007-01-08 16:42:42 Re: Discovering time of last database write