| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More activity in pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2007-01-08 17:02:23 |
| Message-ID: | 11461.1168275743@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com> writes:
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:32 AM, Erik Jones wrote:
>> One question regarding my previous thread about the 8.2 client
>> tools. We have yet to have time (personal as well as usage pattern
>> constraints) to dump our schema to analyze it for any possible
>> discrepencies and clock schema queries. Is there any reason we
>> couldn't use the 8.1 pg_dump facility until such a time as we can
>> figure out our issues with the 8.2 pg_dump client (and psql, etc...)?
> If I recall correctly, older pg_dump clients won't work at all with
> newer postmasters. In fact, I think it will error out.
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend trying. Instead, update to 8.2.1 (released
today) and see if it doesn't fix the problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ragnar | 2007-01-08 17:16:04 | Re: Sorting |
| Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2007-01-08 16:59:05 | Re: Sorting |