From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Date: | 2022-02-10 19:37:06 |
Message-ID: | 6135d0b7-3af9-d6fa-cdaa-990a2fc12147@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/10/22 14:28, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 2/9/22 13:13, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> I do wonder if users find the differences between predefined roles and role
>>> attributes confusing. INHERIT doesn't govern role attributes, but it will
>>> govern predefined roles when this patch is applied. Maybe the role
>>> attribute system should eventually be deprecated in favor of using
>>> predefined roles for everything. Or perhaps the predefined roles should be
>>> converted to role attributes.
>>
>> Yep, I was suggesting that the latter would have been preferable to me while
>> Robert seemed to prefer the former. Honestly I could be happy with either of
>> those solutions, but as I alluded to that is probably a discussion for the
>> next development cycle since I don't see us doing that big a change in this
>> one.
>
> I agree. I still think Joshua's proposed patch is a worthwhile improvement
> for v15.
+1
I am planning to get into it in detail this weekend. So far I have
really just ensured it merges cleanly and passes make world.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-02-10 19:39:30 | Re: Avoid erroring out when unable to remove or parse logical rewrite files to save checkpoint work |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-02-10 19:35:32 | Re: decoupling table and index vacuum |