From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Date: | 2006-07-18 18:49:35 |
Message-ID: | 60u05eagu8.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com (Christopher Kings-Lynne) writes:
>> The major downside is that somewhere between 9000 and 10000
>> VALUES-targetlists produces "ERROR: stack depth limit
>> exceeded". Perhaps for the typical use-case this is sufficient
>> though.
>> I'm open to better ideas, comments, objections...
>
> If the use case is people running MySQL dumps, then there will be
> millions of values-targetlists in MySQL dumps.
Curiosity: How do *does* TheirSQL parse that, and not have the One
Gigantic Query blow up their query parser?
--
output = reverse("gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/unix.html
JOHN CAGE (strapped to table): Do you really expect me to conduct this
antiquated tonal system?
LEONARD BERNSTEIN: No, Mr. Cage, I expect you to die!
[With apologies to music and James Bond fans the world over...]
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-18 19:46:32 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-18 18:19:01 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-18 19:07:53 | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-07-18 18:45:01 | Re: Progress bar updates |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-18 19:20:40 | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-18 18:19:01 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |